key insights
- Leaders should set high standards and focus on building the
team
- Management authenticity is worryingly low studies have
shown
- Manager must be honest and authentic
Author Catherine Smith
Want to be a good boss? Consider stroppy chef Gordon Ramsay your
role model.
Smashing pots and swearing at staff. TV chef Gordon Ramsay-he of
the foul-mouthed, food-throwing ways-actually knows how to lead a
successful team, says Wellington organisational psychologist Dave
Winsborough.
"Ramsay is from all accounts a cherished boss," says
Winsborough. "He does exactly what really good managers do.
He always sets high standards and makes sure people work together
as a team, and he invests lots of time coaching individuals. He's
held on to 80 percent of his staff over the last ten years."
It may sound bleeding obvious that good managers are focused on
the team and the task. But as Winsborough found recently when he
asked 2,000 people from eight large New Zealand organisations about
their bosses, an alarming number of bad managers just don't get it.
They'll let poor performers drift and just can't define good
performance. Unlike Ramsay, who clearly insists on Michelin-star
standards.
Good managers have integrity and honesty, skills that
Winsborough reckons are untrainable (fake sincerity anyone?). But
lack of authenticity is not limited to Kiwi managers, as Lester
Levy, professor at University of Auckland's Excelerator Leadership
Institute, found when comparing the scores of leaders in New
Zealand, Singapore, the US and Russia.
"The levels of authenticity are alarmingly low across all these
countries", says Levy. "But equally alarming is the effect this has
on performance. Bad leadership hollows out the essential capacities
for good performance: self-confidence, optimism, hope and
resilience. How can we expect to be an idea-generating, productive
and engaged society if we have such a fundamentally low score?"
"Ramsay does exactly what really good managers do. He always
sets high standards and makes sure people work together as a team,
and he invests lots of time coaching individuals. He's held on to
80 percent of his staff over the last ten years"
Mind you, notes Winsborough, even good managers struggle to nip
poor performance early, tending to "avoid confrontations and hope
things will sort themselves out" in that nice Kiwi way we have.
Both Levy and Winsborough say managers need to be more real than
right. To grow from sole idea-person to global domination, Kiwi
entrepreneurs need to think about complexity and collaboration, not
being the only person who knows stuff. They also need to be good at
relationships, not just the technical mumbo-jumbo.
"If you think you have to act your way through, then you're
wrong. You don't have to get everything right, everything perfect.
Own up to your flaws and move on," says Levy. "Focus on being real.
Our organisations tend to be over-managed and under-led, but people
are tired of fakes."
"High-quality managers are seen as good people, as well as good
managers," says Winsborough.
Ramsay may not be Mr Calm and Considered, but his brutal honesty
wins every time.
Escape from 20 years of corporate life now allows Catherine
Smith to observe from afar
Good managers are 25 to 30 percent better than poor ones at
managing themselves, building teams, being honest and achieving
results. Source: Winsborough Ltd, The Strengths and Weaknesses
of New Zealand Managers, 2008


read more Articles